Of heeft iemand nog een beter idee?

Geen scanner installeren

Zit dat niet tegenwoordig ingebouwd in Windows?

AVAST, ook gratis.

security essentials

NOD32

Das ni gratis!

Op die manier zijn alle virusscanners gratis.

Op die manier zijn alle virusscanners gratis.

Ben zelf net van McAfee (drama, vooral de-installeren) naar F-Secure geswitched (ik ben een XS4All klant).

Hoe meer ik dit lees hoe tevredener ik ben met mijn keuze om enkele jaren geleden volledig over te stappen op Mac. Welke virussen?

Ik heb eens een uitstapje gemaakt naar Linux. Das alles!

Noooo, ik voorzie een Windows tegen Mac topic

win-bash is a windows port of the famous GNU bash (see GNU Bash homepage).

Unlike other bash ports for windows (e.g. the cygwin bash), the win-bash needs no special environment or DLLs. There is just one binary and that's it.

win-bash is based on nt_bash which was an early bash port for windows nt started by Mountain Math Software some years ago. As far as I know, the nt_bash port project stopped in alpha status and has been never finished.

The goal of the win-bash project is to finish the port to windows and provide a full functional bash.exe binary for windows nt and derived systems. win-bash can be used as a input shell as well as an interpreter to run un*x shell scripts

Noooo, ik voorzie een Windows tegen Mac topic

windows vs. mac/linux/bsd/qnx/etc....
en zeuren over zulke dingen is niet rechtvaardig aangezien er genoeg bron code in windows zit die bij linux/bsd vandaan komt.

Volgens mij is Microsoft er al heel wat langer dan Linux en is de broncode van Linux deels gebaseerd op het ouderwetse DOS. Maar goed, is leuk om de historie te zien en er zijn ook erg leuke documentaires van.

steve, bill en linus komen mekaar tegen op de wc.
nadat bill klaar was met plassen loopt hij naar de wasbak en wast heeeeel grondig zijn handen met goed veel zeep en vertelt steve en linus "wij bij microsoft doen ons werkt grondig en goed".
gevolgd door steve die net zo hard begint te poetsen als bill maar hij herhaalt het nogmaals terwijl hij uitlegt "wij bij apple doen ons werk niet alleen grondig maar wij doen ook een stapje terug om te controleren of we het echt wel goed hebben gedaan".
linus kijkt dit schouwspel aan, schud zijn hoofd en loopt zonder zijn handen te wassen het toilet uit maar word terug geroepen door bill en steve.
"hey linus, zou je je handen niet wassen?"
waarop linus zich omkeert en zegt "wij bij linux pissen gewoon niet over onze handen".

How many FreeBSD hackers does it take to change a lightbulb?

One thousand, one hundred and sixty-nine:
Twenty-three to complain to -CURRENT about the lights being out;
Four to claim that it is a configuration problem, and that such matters really belong on -questions;
Three to submit PRs about it, one of which is misfiled under doc and consists only of “it's dark”;
One to commit an untested lightbulb which breaks buildworld, then back it out five minutes later;
Eight to flame the PR originators for not including patches in their PRs;
Five to complain about buildworld being broken;
Thirty-one to answer that it works for them, and they must have cvsupped at a bad time;
One to post a patch for a new lightbulb to -hackers;
One to complain that he had patches for this three years ago, but when he sent them to -CURRENT they were just ignored, and he has had bad experiences with the PR system; besides, the proposed new lightbulb is non-reflexive;
Thirty-seven to scream that lightbulbs do not belong in the base system, that committers have no right to do things like this without consulting the Community, and WHAT IS -CORE DOING ABOUT IT!?
Two hundred to complain about the color of the bicycle shed;
Three to point out that the patch breaks style(9);
Seventeen to complain that the proposed new lightbulb is under GPL;
Five hundred and eighty-six to engage in a flame war about the comparative advantages of the GPL, the BSD license, the MIT license, the NPL, and the personal hygiene of unnamed FSF founders;
Seven to move various portions of the thread to -chat and -advocacy;
One to commit the suggested lightbulb, even though it shines dimmer than the old one;
Two to back it out with a furious flame of a commit message, arguing that FreeBSD is better off in the dark than with a dim lightbulb;
Forty-six to argue vociferously about the backing out of the dim lightbulb and demanding a statement from -core;
Eleven to request a smaller lightbulb so it will fit their Tamagotchi if we ever decide to port FreeBSD to that platform;
Seventy-three to complain about the SNR on -hackers and -chat and unsubscribe in protest;
Thirteen to post “unsubscribe”, “How do I unsubscribe?”, or “Please remove me from the list”, followed by the usual footer;
One to commit a working lightbulb while everybody is too busy flaming everybody else to notice;
Thirty-one to point out that the new lightbulb would shine 0.364% brighter if compiled with TenDRA (although it will have to be reshaped into a cube), and that FreeBSD should therefore switch to TenDRA instead of GCC;
One to complain that the new lightbulb lacks fairings;
Nine (including the PR originators) to ask “what is MFC?”;
Fifty-seven to complain about the lights being out two weeks after the bulb has been changed.

Nik Clayton adds:
I was laughing quite hard at this.
And then I thought, “Hang on, shouldn't there be '1 to document it.' in that list somewhere?”
And then I was enlightened
Thomas Abthorpe says: “None, real FreeBSD hackers are not afraid of the dark!”